hints, allegations and things left unsaid...
When it rains, click
The third one looks like a series of pictures for an animation! Particularly liked the reflection of the drops on the top. Nice, but would you mind posting the coloured version of the same?
Wish you'd taken the clouds without those power lines in between..
Don't worry, wouldn't judge your camera too soon! :)
By R, at 12.7.05
the last picture is fantastic...
By thotpurge, at 13.7.05
This is the time for you to start a vlog. I guess, your new camera has a movie facility using which you can record small length mvoies.
By , at 13.7.05
You started inspiring rain now..:-)
By Sudhakar, at 13.7.05
Unfortunately, I was shooting these droplets by putting the camera in b/w mode so no colored versions :-(.
Actually the power lines are there for a purpose. They look like they are trying to weave the same pattern in the sky as is seen in the grille of the window-pane.
Hello Dr. Pavanaja,
Unfortunately this one doesn't support videos (at least I haven't been able to find a video mode). My minolta used to do videos and I even posted a couple of them but looks like now I'll need to focus on stills...
:) Thanks Sudhakar but it will always be the other way round!
By Deepak, at 14.7.05
Lovely pictures. Our land is dry dry dry. They make me feel thirsty
By granny p, at 14.7.05
now that you have experiences with both fixed lens and DSLR, would you say that your minolta[or a higher end fixed lens] couldn't have given you these photos ?
i am interested because i am yet to understand the things that fixed lens 'can't do' which dslr 'can do' vs. fixed lens 'can do' which dslr 'can do a lot better'. I mean, just speaking of the three interesting pictures, couldn't you have clicked those with yout minolta or another high-end fixed lens camera ?
i would like to possess a dslr also someday, but i feel i must hit the limits of fixed lens first. thats what, basically, i am not sure of.
By Richard Hsu, at 14.7.05
Composition-wise yes - may be. (though in 2nd and 3rd pictures the area covered might have been a little less). But looking at the entire picture in its entire 8 Megapixel glory, I can tell the clarity/sharpness (especially at regions farther from center of the picture) would be hard to expect from my Minolta.
Also, low light photography without flash (let's say indoor lightening conditions at office), is almost impossible without high exposure times (you'll need tripod) and noise. With my camera.. I can throw a good fast lens with big aperture (lets say my current 50 mm f1.8) and manage without flash (at say ISO 400 which gives very little noise) under indentical light conditions.
A high end fixed-lens camera might allow you this to some extent, but I haven't come across any with f/1.8! (That again is understandable - given the size constrains, you can open a lens (increase it's aperture) by only as much).
The other thing a wide range of aperturs allows you to do is to control the depth of field. With bigger apertures you get less depth - e.g. the picture here was shot with a 50mm lens at f/2.0 (a rather big aperture), giving me depth of field barely enough to cover the entire depth of facial features - notice how fuzzy ('bokeh' in photography speak ;-))the background is (come to think of it, even the ears are looking blurred!)
Ok I cannot shoot videos on my DSLR - but that's understandable given how a DSLR works.
I don't seem to be able to get good extreme close-ups (quas-macro?) with either of the two lenses I own. The closest my 18-55 mm zoom lens allows me to come to my subject is 0.9 ft!. Most fixed lens digitals allow you 5 cm these days! Yes, this situation can be remedied by a macro lens but it will leave me lighter by some 200$ :-)
That said, I am still a newbee and have barely started to discover what I can and cannot do.
In last two years the technology has improved and you'll find fixed lens cameras (even mid-end ones) are coming closer to DSLRs each day - at least quality-wise if not control-wise :)
By Deepak, at 15.7.05
By Richard Hsu, at 16.7.05
thanks deepak. enjoy all your efforts no matter how small or how large.
By zeldamax yoshi, at 18.7.05
Deepak, you can pick up a cheap set of macro rings from this shop on MG Road (towards the Anil Kumble Circle end, not sure what the actual name of the shop is - the Canon name is there on their display.) Works okay for subjects on, say, a desktop.
By sajith, at 19.7.05
Hi Granny - we are having too much of a good thing here for past few days. I'd love to see the sun shine brightly for a change!
By Deepak, at 19.7.05
Thanks Sajith, I think you mean GG (or is it JJ?) Welling. Shall keep an eye out!
By Deepak, at 19.7.05
The last picture looks like you have captured the various growth stages of the moon from a distant satellite..:)
By Chitra, at 20.7.05
I was simply taken aback at the pictures... I think you need not write anything at all in your blog. The pictures themselves depict everything thats necessary... Ah its awesome!
By Lakshmi, at 31.7.05
A new camera can make a difference in the quality of photos.. but this one's made a difference in the styling and composition as well... amazing photographs
By Rahul Kumar, at 2.1.06
Post a Comment
May 2003 | June 2003 | July 2003 | August 2003 | September 2003 | October 2003 | November 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | Current Posts
All material posted on this blog is copyrighted and may not be used in any form without the explicit permission of the author.